Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41474714›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Contemporary clinical applications of venous excess ultrasound: A scoping review protocol.

Shoheb Hassan, Ali Hassan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shoheb HassanAston Medical School, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1235-3316
Ali HassanUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2698-871X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis scoping review aims to synthesise the primary literature on the current and emerging clinical applications of venous excess ultrasound, with a particular interest in its use beyond acute and critical care contexts.

introductionVenous excess ultrasound is a novel point-of-care ultrasound tool designed to assess systemic venous congestion. While it has been widely adopted in critical and acute care settings, increasing clinical interest suggests broader diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic utility beyond these contexts. Despite this, no comprehensive synthesis has yet mapped the full range of its clinical applications. INCLUSION CRITERIA: We will include primary studies involving patients of any age or clinical indication in which venous excess ultrasound has been applied in clinical care. Only studies published in English from 1 January 2020 onward will be considered. Inclusion is limited to studies reporting on the clinical utility of venous excess ultrasound. Non-human studies, abstract-only publications, secondary reviews, and purely technical imaging studies without clinical application will be excluded.

methodsFollowing PRISMA-ScR guidelines, this scoping review will conduct systematic searches of both peer-reviewed and grey literature sources, including PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, ProQuest, Google Scholar, preprint servers, and clinical trial registries. Where literature sources allow, searches will be limited to studies written in English and published from 1 January 2020 onward. References will be managed and deduplicated using Zotero. Full-text screening and data extraction will be performed independently by two reviewers using Rayyan and standardised Microsoft Excel forms. Disagreements will be resolved through discussion or, if necessary, by a third reviewer. Results will be summarised in tables and narratively.

Indexed as

VeinsHumansPoint-of-Care SystemsScoping Reviews as TopicUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID41474714
PMCPMC12755780

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.