Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41474757›Full record

ArticleClinical nuclear medicine2026

Imaging of Small Lung Nodules on Modern SAFOV and LAFOV PET in Combination With Data-driven Motion Correction: Implications for Current Practice.

Alexander Weissensee, Carola Maria Bregenzer, Marco Viscione, Clemens Mingels, Hasan Sari, Federico Caobelli, Robert Seifert, Axel Rominger, Thomas Pyka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical nuclear medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alexander WeissenseeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern.ORCID 0009-0003-5542-2905
Carola Maria BregenzerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern.ORCID 0009-0007-3755-4807
Marco ViscioneDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern.
Clemens MingelsDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern.
Hasan SariDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern.
Federico CaobelliDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern.ORCID 0000-0003-2472-775
Robert SeifertDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern.ORCID 0000-0001-5985-7701
Axel RomingerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern.ORCID 0000-0002-1954-736
Thomas PykaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGuidelines recommend [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT for lung nodules >8 mm only. For smaller lesions, PET/CT has not been recommended due to lower lesion conspicuity. However, this threshold was established using earlier generations of PET scanners. In this work, we sought to evaluate the combined effects of modern scanner technology, long-axial-field-of-view (LAFOV) PET and data-driven respiratory motion correction on lung nodule imaging. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe identified 55 consecutive patients with lung nodules who underwent [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT for a known or suspected malignancy. We created image reconstructions with combinations of simulated short-axial-field-of-view (sSAFOV), LAFOV, and data-driven gating (DDG) and measured effects on image parameters. We then gathered follow-up data (over 13 mo) to establish nodule benignity or malignancy and evaluated effects on diagnostic accuracy with receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) analysis.

resultsAll methods showed good to excellent diagnostic accuracy, even for nodules <6 mm, with AUCs consistently above 0.85. LAFOV reduced noise compared with sSAFOV, and adding DDG increased the median SUV max by 32%. The combination of LAFOV and DDG showed the highest image quality improvement compared with sSAFOV, with a median improvement in contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of 29%.

conclusionsData-driven motion correction and LAFOV-PET provide synergistic improvements in image quality. Furthermore, the high diagnostic accuracy of sSAFOV reconstructions for lung nodules ≤8 mm, and even <6 mm, indicates that assessment of lung nodules smaller than current guideline recommendations might be possible.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedLung NeoplasmsPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMovementDDGLAFOV PETlong-axial field-of-view PETmotion correctionNSCLCOncofreezesmall lung nodules

Identifiers

PMID41474757
PMCPMC12947918

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.