ArticlePloS one2025
Spatial divergence between self-rated health and body mass index in China: Exploring the role of economic status using China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) 2016 and 2020.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health disparities across China remained a major public health concern, with both individual and regional economic conditions shaping variations in health outcomes. In the context of the "Healthy China 2030" initiative, this study used data from the 2016 and 2020 waves of the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) and applied multivariate multilevel logistic regression models to examine the associations between economic status at the individual and province levels and two key health indicators: self-rated health (SRH) and body mass index (BMI). The results showed that, at the individual level, a higher total value of durable consumer goods was negatively associated with having a normal BMI, whereas higher travel expenditure, per capita living space, and total cash and deposits were associated with a greater likelihood of reporting good SRH. At the province level, higher mean income exhibited a negative association with normal BMI and moderated the effects of household economic resources: income growth reduced health disparities in some dimensions (e.g., living space, cultural and entertainment spending) but widened them in others (e.g., vehicle purchase expenses). Spatial mapping further indicated that southern provinces tended to exhibit healthier BMI distributions but lower levels of good SRH compared with northern regions, revealing a clear spatial divergence between subjective and objective health measures. These findings highlighted the complex, multilevel, and spatially uneven relationships between economic status and health in China. Policy efforts should aim to strengthen household economic resilience, reduce regional health inequalities, and tailor interventions to local contexts to promote health equity nationwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.