ReviewThe Journal of nutrition2026
What Is the Role of Plant-Based Alternatives to Animal Foods in the Great Food Transformation: A Narrative Review.
Review in The Journal of nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several plant-based alternatives to animal foods (PBAFs) have been introduced to the market in the past decade to provide consumers with an easy substitution for animal protein. Despite the extensive literature on the nutritional composition of these plant-based products, these products must be assessed considering their impacts on diets, the environment, and society. This critical review aims to evaluate the role of plant-based alternatives to animal foods in the Great Food Transformation and their potential health effects. Results of 9 diet modeling studies have indicated that substituting animal foods with plant-based alternatives would put certain populations at risk of inadequate intake of micronutrients, particularly of bioavailable iron, vitamin B12, calcium, and iodine. Nutritional composition studies have shown that meat alternatives are generally similar to meat in protein and micronutrient content but with higher carbohydrates and sodium. Milk and yoghurt alternatives made from cereals, coconut, and nuts have significantly lower protein levels compared with their animal counterparts, whereas soy-based alternatives are the most comparable to animal dairy products. This review shows that there are nutritional pitfalls from the substitution of animal foods with PBAFs. There is a window of opportunity to use these industrially produced foods to improve nutrition. This review concluded that PBAFs could be used to ease the Great Food Transformation by providing foods that resemble function and appearance to consumers, by offering familiar tastes and dishes. Moreover, PBAFs should be considered in future nutritional policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.