ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026
Postural control characteristics as reflected by center of pressure measurements in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients at varying post-operative stages: a cross-sectional comparative study.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross-education effects of healthy-side lower-limb strength training on neuromuscular function recovery following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Trial
- Comparison of gait characteristics at different postoperative phases following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare center of pressure (COP) characteristics and postural control changes in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) patients across distinct post-operative phases and to establish quantitative evidence for post-operative functional assessment.
methodsThis cross-sectional controlled study enrolled participants prospectively. One hundred ACLR patients (n = 100) were stratified into five post-operative cohorts: Group A (1.5-3 months, n = 20), Group B (3-6 months, n = 20), Group C (6-9 months, n = 20), Group D (9-12 months, n = 20), and Group E (≥ 12 months; mean ± SD: 16.9 ± 3.3 months, n = 20). A control group of 20 healthy individuals without history of lower limb injury (Group F) was included. All ACLR patients underwent standardized rehabilitation protocols according to institutional guidelines. The Zebris plantar pressure analysis system was used to measure center of pressure trajectory parameters at self-selected comfortable walking speed, including gait line length, single-limb support line length, anteroposterior displacement, and mediolateral displacement. Limb symmetry indices were calculated by comparing the operative and non-operative limbs, and postural control differences across post-operative stages were determined through between-group comparisons.
resultsGait line length and single-limb support line length were significantly shorter on the operative limb compared with the non-operative limb (P < 0.05), whereas no significant bilateral differences were observed in the control group (P > 0.05). Between-group comparisons revealed significant differences in center of pressure parameters across the post-operative stages (P < 0.05). Gait line length in Groups A through E was reduced by 30.0%, 15.3%, 11.1%, 6.8%, and 2.0%, respectively, relative to the control group. Single-limb support line length demonstrated corresponding reductions of 83.4%, 54.0%, 34.8%, 20.6%, and 16.1%, respectively, from Groups A through E. Anteroposterior displacement in Groups B and C was significantly greater than in the control group, whereas mediolateral displacement in Groups A, B, and C was significantly greater than in the control group (P < 0.01).
conclusionPatients in the post-operative ACLR cohorts demonstrated abnormal center of pressure parameters and significant functional asymmetry between limbs. Center of pressure parameters across all post-operative timepoint groups were lower than in the healthy control group, indicating that center of pressure-based postural control assessment provides objective quantitative metrics for post-operative functional evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.