ReviewThe ultrasound journal2025
Effectiveness of obstetric point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) training: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on the ADDIE training model.
Review in The ultrasound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo identify the core components of obstetric point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) training programs while simultaneously evaluating the effectiveness of these programs using the Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement, and Evaluate (ADDIE) model.
methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis followed a PROSPERO-registered protocol (CRD42024566260) and adhered to PRISMA2020, Cochrane Handbook, and JBI Manual guidelines. Comprehensive searches from database inception to September 22, 2024, covered international and Chinese databases to identify studies evaluating obstetric POCUS training. Two independent reviewers screened studies, assessed methodological quality with JBI tools, and extracted data on study, participant, intervention, and outcome characteristics. Training content was mapped to the ADDIE instructional design model via thematic and framework analyses. Meta-analyses of comparable quantitative outcomes used random-effects models. Integrating quantitative and qualitative findings, this review systematically evaluated the effectiveness and implementation of obstetric POCUS training programs.
resultsSystematic synthesis showed that obstetric POCUS training significantly improved healthcare providers' competencies, including knowledge, skills, sustained use, and clinical decision-making. Training also increased antenatal care attendance and identification of high-risk pregnancies, while reducing referrals and optimizing resource use. However, limitations were noted in needs assessment, implementation flexibility, and outcome evaluation. Using thematic and framework analyses combined with the ADDIE model, we systematically organized training phases and key components to provide a scientific basis for program improvement and optimization.
conclusionsObstetric POCUS training effectively enhances clinical competencies and improves maternal and neonatal health outcomes. Applying the ADDIE model offers a replicable, practical, and sustainable approach for developing standardized training programs. Future obstetric POCUS training should leverage the ADDIE model and adapt to local contexts to improve maternal and neonatal health globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.