ArticleVirology journal2025
In vitro evaluation of bidirectional transcription levels of five types of non-coding control regions of Merkel cell polyomavirus.
Article in Virology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) has been identified as the causative agent of Merkel cell carcinoma, and its non-coding control region (NCCR) has been demonstrated to play a critical role in regulating viral transcription. While NCCR variants exist, their comparative impact on bidirectional promoter activity remains poorly characterized. The present study conducted an in vitro evaluation of bidirectional transcription levels of five major MCPyV NCCR types (I, IIa-1, IIa-2, IIb, IIc). The NCCRs were subsequently cloned into a bidirectional reporter vector, which expresses green (EGFP, early) and red (RFP, late) fluorescent proteins. Subsequent to transfection into HEK293 cells, promoter activity was quantitatively analyzed via fluorescence imaging and flow cytometry. Bioinformatic analysis revealed high sequence similarity (> 94%) among the five NCCRs and predicted conserved transcription factor binding sites. The results indicated that all the variants exhibited stronger late promoter activity compared with the early promoter activity (p < 0.01). These observations are in alignment with the established biology of MCPyV. However, no statistically significant differences in the early/late transcription ratio or overall fluorescence intensity were observed between the different NCCR types under these conditions. These findings suggest that the core promoter function is conserved among these major NCCR variants in this model system. This study provides a foundational comparison of MCPyV NCCR activity, highlighting the need for further investigation in more physiologically relevant models to understand how NCCR diversity may influence viral pathogenesis in vivo. Moreover, incorporating models of viral genome integration is essential to understand mechanism of MCPyV carcinogenesis and viral-host interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.