Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41476460›Full record

ReviewACS omega2025

A Systematic Review of Drug-Related InteractionsUtilizing Deep Learning and LLMs for Prediction and Mitigation.

Soheila Behrooznia, Mohsen Hooshmand

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Soheila BehroozniaDepartment of Computer Science and Information Technology, Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences (IASBS), Zanjan 45137-66731, Iran.
Mohsen HooshmandDepartment of Computer Science and Information Technology, Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences (IASBS), Zanjan 45137-66731, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2934-2675

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational drug discovery is essential for screening potential treatments and reducing the costs and time associated with proposing or combining drugs for disease management. Despite the extensive research conducted in this field, it remains an emerging area, particularly with the advent of machine learning, deep learning, and large language models (LLMs). This systematic review examines the integration of machine learning and deep learning techniques in drug discovery, concentrating on three critical areas: drug-drug interactions (DDIs), drug-target interactions (DTIs), and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The review analyzes over 100 papers published between 2020 and 2025, categorizing the methods into deep learning, machine learning, graph learning, and hybrid models. It highlights the transformative impact of natural language processing (NLP) and LLMs in extracting meaningful insights from biomedical literature and chemical data. Furthermore, this work introduces key databases and data sets widely utilized in drug discovery. Additionally, this review identifies gaps in the existing research, such as the lack of comprehensive studies that simultaneously address DDI, DTI, and ADR extraction, and it proposes a more holistic approach to fill these gaps. The paper concludes by thoroughly evaluating various models, underscoring their performance metrics.

Identifiers

PMID41476460
PMCPMC12750216

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.