Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41476598›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025

Noninvasive MGMT-promotor methylation prediction in high grade gliomas using conventional MRI and deep learning-based segmentations.

Edin Zahirovic, Tim Salomonsson, Malte Knutsson, Xavier Saenz Sarda, Jimmy Lätt, Sara Kinhult, Mattias Belting, Anna Rydelius, Johan Bengzon, Linda Knutsson and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Edin ZahirovicDivision of Radiology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Tim SalomonssonDivision of Radiology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Malte KnutssonDivision of Radiology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Xavier Saenz SardaDivision of Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Jimmy LättDepartment of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Sara KinhultDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Oncology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Mattias BeltingDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Oncology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Anna RydeliusDivision of Neurology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Johan BengzonKamprad Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Linda KnutssonF. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Pia C SundgrenDivision of Radiology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/objectives: High grade gliomas (HGG) are aggressive brain tumors, most frequently glioblastoma and astrocytoma grade 4. Methylation of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter in HGG is crucial for temozolomide efficacy. As MGMT promoter methylation (MGMTpm) assessment requires tumor tissue, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is of interest for non-invasive prediction. We aimed to analyze volumetric data from edema, contrast-enhancing tumor, necrosis, total-tumor and total-tumor/edema ratio for MGMTpm prediction in HGG. Further we assessed overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) between groups and volumes. Methods: Segmentation was performed using deep learning models (DL-models), DeepBraTumIA and Raidionics, on 70 HGG patients (45 males, 32 MGMTpm). Manual segmentation was conducted in 37 for validation of DL-models. Group differences were evaluated using Man-Whitney U tests and receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curves. Multivariate analysis was conducted using logistic regression and bootstrapping. Dice coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Kruskal-Wallis test evaluated DL-model performance. Results: MGMTpm tumors displayed significantly larger edema, segmented by DeepBraTumIA ( Conclusion: This study suggests that significant radiological differences in MGMTpm can be found using deep learning models, primarily in tumor edema volume. MGMTpm status and region of interest volumes impact OS and PFS. Future studies should incorporate other molecular imaging sequences for methylation prediction.

Indexed as

deep learninghigh grade glioma (HGG)methylationMGMTMRI

Identifiers

PMID41476598
PMCPMC12748209

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.