SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2025
Exploring the landscape of developmental and epileptic encephalopathies and gene research global dynamics via bibliometric study 2001-2025.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective background: The aim of this study is to analyze the current research status and future prospects of the field of developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) and gene through bibliometric methods. It aims to explore the trends and potential developments in this field. Methods: A systematic search of the DEE and gene literature from 2001 to 2025.2 was conducted using the Web of Science core collection database. Supplementary PubMed searches for this field's clinical research trends ensured verified data comprehensiveness and methodological rigor. Quantitative analysis of co-authorship networks was performed using VOSviewer and CiteSpace tools. Results: A total of 1,022 articles related to the field of DEE and gene were included in this study, authored by 8,355 researchers affiliated with 7,238 institutions across 315 countries. United States emerged as the leading research countries in this field, with the National Institute of Health and Medical Research. Professor Ingrid Scheffer had the highest number of publications in this field, and the journal Conclusion: The research on DEE and gene is currently experiencing rapid growth. The field is expanding, and the research is becoming more in-depth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.