ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2025
Comparative Evaluation of Locally Applied Chlorhexidine 1% Gel and
Article in International journal of dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Evaluation of Locally Applied Chlorhexidine 1% Gel andInternational journal of dentistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Periodontal disease is polymicrobial in nature and to control the infection we need to target the inflammatory component. Nonsurgical periodontal therapy is used for mechanical debridement. Use of agents along with nonsurgical periodontal therapy is gaining momentum. Locally delivered agents like antibiotics and herbal products are used in nonsurgical and surgical periodontal therapy. Phytotherapy offers antioxidant, antimicrobial action and has less chances of drug resistance. Objective: This study design compared locally delivered chlorhexidine (CHX) 1% gel and Material and Method: Forty-six subjects diagnosed with Grade II/III localized periodontitis were randomly assigned into two groups. After thorough SRP, CSPE gel placement was done in the test group and 1% CHX gel in the control group. Clinical parameters measured were probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL) and microbiological analysis (bacterial culture from pocket sample) was done prior to SRP and at 60 days. Results: Both the 1% CHX and CSPE gel provide comparable outcome ( Conclusion: Locally delivered herbal CSPE gel can be an effective, economical,and antibacterial gel as an adjunctive treatment of periodontitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.