ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2025
Family and community medicine workforce training and practice in the Americas.
Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study sought to analyze the current state of the training for and practice of family medicine and family and community medicine to identify gaps and opportunities to implement strategic actions to strengthen the health workforce. Methods: This paper reports the results of an observational, analytical, cross-sectional study carried out in countries in the World Health Organization's Region of the Americas in 2024. A 22-item survey was administered to members of professional associations of family medicine and family and community medicine practitioners, and a 12-item survey was administered to specialists in this field. Nineteen professional associations and 291 specialists took part in the study. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and content analysis. Results: Training in family medicine and family and community medicine is primarily conducted through specialization (68.4%, 13/19) and residency programs (63.2%, 12/19), and a competency exam is required in 63.2% (12/19) of the 23 countries included in the study, represented by 19 professional associations. Training programs cover topics relevant to professional practice, but progress needs to be made, especially in addressing emerging topics. There are few opportunities for continuing education, as reported by 53.7% (29/54) of specialists in Central America, the Latin Caribbean and Mexico, and 35.0% (79/226) in South America. There is a gap in actions aimed at improving working conditions, with policies for well-being and retention implemented in only 36.8% (7/19) of the countries. In addition, responses to open-ended questions indicated that many professionals had a heavy workload, and that their jobs were insecure and precarious, as well as that remuneration was incompatible with their functions, that infrastructure was inadequate, and there was a lack of resources for practice. Despite sampling limitations related to the non-probabilistic design of the study and the unequal participation among countries, it nonetheless provides valuable evidence about training and practice in family and community medicine in the Region of the Americas. Conclusions: Although the practice of family medicine and family and community medicine has been established for more than three decades in the Region, the field faces significant implementation challenges. Strategic investments are needed to strengthen the recognition and perceived value of family and community medicine as a specialty, ensure adequate working conditions and improve the quality of education. Strengthening family and community medicine by undertaking coordinated actions across multiple stakeholders is crucial for building resilient health systems grounded in primary health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.