ArticleQatar medical journal2025
The impact of increased nuchal translucency on pregnancy outcomes: A retrospective cohort study in Qatar.
Article in Qatar medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nuchal translucency (NT) measurement by ultrasound is used in the first trimester as a screening tool for genetic, chromosomal, and structural anomalies. As the NT measurement increases, the risk of an underlying abnormality also rises. This study aims to evaluate the significance of increased NT measurements within a local cohort, examining their associations with adverse pregnancy outcomes and their potential role in guiding clinical interventions. Methods: Pregnancies with first-trimester fetal NT measurements greater than 2.5 mm were included. Participants were categorized into five groups based on NT measurements: ≤3.4 mm, 3.5-4.4 mm, 4.5-5.4 mm, 5.5-6.4 mm and ≥6.5 mm. The outcomes evaluated included chromosomal anomalies confirmed by invasive testing (such as Trisomy 21), major congenital anomalies involving any major organ system, and miscarriage or termination of pregnancy before 24 weeks of gestation. Gestational age at delivery, birthweight, small-for-dates (SFD) status, and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) were evaluated for infants born after 24 weeks of gestation without congenital anomalies. Results: The median NT measurement among the 290 women in the study was 3.7 mm, ranging from 2.9 mm (25th centile) to 7.4 mm (75th centile). Overall, 43.5% of the participants were in the lowest NT category, while 15.9% were in the highest category. Maternal age, body mass index, and nationality were comparable between the groups. The odds of chromosomal anomalies increased with higher NT measurements, with odds ratio (OR) ranging from 2.50 to 4.02 ( Conclusion: Adverse outcomes, including chromosomal and congenital anomalies, increased with higher NT measurements, with a significant difference observed beyond 3.4 mm. These findings highlight the importance of early NT screening and targeted interventions to improve perinatal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.