Evidence mapPaperPMID 41477339Full record

ReviewActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B2025

Progress in peptide and protein therapeutics: Challenges and strategies.

Mengyang Liu, Darren Svirskis, Thomas Proft, Jacelyn Loh, Naibo Yin, Hao Li, Danhui Li, Yongzhi Zhou, Shuo Chen, Lizhuo Song and 11 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Virtual screening and experimental validation of a METTL3-targeting peptide withJournal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Mengyang LiuSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.
Darren SvirskisSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.
Thomas ProftDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.
Jacelyn LohDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.
Naibo YinSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.
Hao LiGongli Hospital of Shanghai Pudong New Area, Shanghai 200135, China.
Danhui LiSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.
Yongzhi ZhouSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.
Shuo ChenSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.
Lizhuo SongSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.
Guanyu ChenSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518063, China.
Wei-Yue LuSchool of Pharmacy, Fudan University, Shanghai 201203, China.
Zhiwen ZhangSchool of Pharmacy, Fudan University, Shanghai 201203, China.
Zhou ZhouKey Laboratory of Drug Targeting and Drug Delivery, West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Lian LiKey Laboratory of Drug Targeting and Drug Delivery, West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Yuan HuangKey Laboratory of Drug Targeting and Drug Delivery, West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Craig BuntThe Department of Food Science, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.
Guiju SunDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China.
Paul W R HarrisMaurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.
Margaret A BrimbleMaurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.
Jingyuan WenSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peptide- and protein-based therapeutics offer realized and potential benefits to health, due to their potent bioactivity, high specificity, and favorable safety characteristics. However, their widespread clinical application is constrained by inherent limitations, including rapid enzymatic degradation, poor membrane permeability, and a reliance on parenteral administration, which reduces patient adherence. To overcome these challenges, extensive research has explored non-invasive delivery strategies, including topical, transdermal, and oral formulations. Despite promising advances in these delivery strategies, they are yet to overcome substantial biological and physicochemical barriers in peptide and protein therapeutics, such as enzymatic degradation in the gastrointestinal tract, limited epithelial transport, and inherently low systemic bioavailability. This review provides a comprehensive and up-to-date analysis of the structural and physiological barriers influencing peptide and protein bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy. It critically examines key challenges associated with various administration routes, including topical, transdermal, oral (including delivery targeting the brain), and others. Furthermore, it explores innovative strategies to enhance peptide and protein stability and bioavailability, including chemical modifications, enzyme inhibitors, penetration enhancers, physical delivery technologies, and advanced nanoparticulate formulations. Additionally, emerging trends in formulation optimization, regulatory considerations, and translational pathways for clinical implementation are discussed. By addressing these critical challenges and highlighting recent advances, this review serves as a roadmap for the development of next-generation peptide and protein therapeutics with improved stability and efficacy, and enhanced patient adherence, which is needed to fully realize the true potential of this class of therapeutics.

Indexed as

Blood‒brain barriersChemical modificationEnzymatic inhibitorsGastrointestinal barriersNanoparticulate drug delivery systemsPenetration enhancersPeptides and proteinsSkin barriers

Identifiers

PMID41477339
PMCPMC12750180

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.