ReviewActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B2025
ROS-scavenging nanomaterials as emerging tools for bone tissue regeneration: A comprehensive review of recent progress.
Review in Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sonodynamic CoMg-Quercetin Nanozyme for Antibacterial Therapy and Multifunctional Bone Regeneration in Infectious Bone Defects.Biomaterials research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone defects, characterized by a loss of skeletal structure integrity, represent a prevalent clinical challenge affecting millions of patients. While bone autografts and allografts offer potential solutions, limitations, including donor scarcity, immune rejection, anatomical constraints, and complications arising from host comorbidities such as diabetes, often lead to unsatisfactory outcomes. This necessitates the need for alternative treatments. Researchers have identified that reactive oxygen species (ROS) play a crucial role in bone regeneration. Although physiological ROS levels are essential for normal healing, excessive ROS accumulation disrupts the balance between bone formation and resorption, hindering regeneration. Antioxidants can mitigate oxidative stress by scavenging ROS or inhibiting their formation, thereby restoring the equilibrium between bone formation and resorption. Advances in nanotechnology have enabled the development of various ROS-scavenging nanomaterials with enhanced therapeutic efficacy. These nanomaterials either function as delivery platforms for conventional antioxidants or as direct ROS-neutralizing agents through intrinsic redox or enzyme-mimicking properties. This review comprehensively summarizes ROS-scavenging nanomaterials for bone tissue regeneration, focusing on their design strategies, underlying mechanisms, applications, and potential for clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.