ReviewClinical neuropsychiatry2025
Genetic Risk, Self-Harm, and Violence in Schizophrenia: A Narrative Review of Implications for Early Identification and Intervention.
Review in Clinical neuropsychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This narrative review examines clinical, genetic, and epidemiological evidence on schizophrenia (SCZ) to identify predictors of self-harm and violence, summarize genetic contributors to SCZ including pleiotropy and links between polygenic burden and negative/disorganized symptoms, and evaluate implications for early identification and predictive tools. Method: We synthesized findings from large-scale genome-wide association studies, rare variant and polygenic risk research, gene-environment interplay, epidemiological studies on suicide and violence, and clinical trials of early-intervention programs for SCZ. Results: SCZ involves a complex genetic architecture that includes hundreds of common risk variants and rarer coding and structural mutations. These genetic factors interact with environmental exposures, particularly childhood adversity and substance use, to shape vulnerability trajectories. Suicidality is a leading cause of excess mortality in SCZ, especially in early disease phases. Violence risk is modest overall but elevated in individuals with untreated psychosis or comorbid substance misuse. Emerging findings suggest that polygenic burden is linked to negative and disorganized symptoms, which in turn associate with worse clinical outcomes. Early, sustained, multicomponent intervention improves symptoms, functioning, and treatment adherence and may reduce self-harm and indirectly mitigate violence by addressing modifiable risk factors. Emerging machine learning models, though not yet widely validated, show promise in identifying individuals at higher risk of suicide or aggression by integrating clinical, demographic, and biological features. Conclusions: Integrating genetic, clinical, and environmental data can enhance risk stratification and support precision prevention in SCZ. Polygenic risk scores are not yet clinically predictive alone but may add value when combined with symptom profiles and early-life adversity for early identification and detecting susceptibility to negative/disorganized symptoms. Near-term priorities include externally validating prediction tools, standardizing screening for trauma exposure and substance use within early-psychosis services to guide monitoring intensity and relapse-prevention planning, and scaling coordinated specialty care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.