ArticleClinical neuropsychiatry2025
Profiling Teen Social Networking Sites Users: Developmental, Identity, and Psychological Issues.
Article in Clinical neuropsychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: in the last decades, social networking sites (SNSs) use among adolescents has dramatically increased, feeding the adolescents' needs. However, younger users might be more vulnerable to problematic social networking. Scholar research increasingly highlighted the need to explore the underlying mechanisms of problematic use of SNSs. Difficulties in emotion regulation, general distress, experiences of shame, and specific motivations for SNSs use might represent risk factors for problematic social networking. On the contrary, other variables adolescence-related and potentially involved in problematic SNSs use (emptiness, boredom, emotional autonomy, and self-concept clarity) need further exploration. Method: the present person-centered study aimed at profiling SNSs teen users (13-19 years) based on their (problematic) social networking, by comparing their SNSs-related behaviors and motivations, emotional dysregulation, distress symptoms, emptiness, boredom, shame, self-concept clarity, and emotional autonomy. Results: the study involved 774 Italian adolescents (57% females; mean age = 15.74 ± 1.62 years) and four different profiles characterized by unique patterns of (problematic) social networking were identified through the latent profile analysis (LPA): (1) non-problematic SNSs users, (2) at-risk SNSs users, (3) problematic SNSs users, and (4) defended SNSs users (ntp=218; AIC=39125.44; BIC=39988.37; SSABIC=39296.00; entropy=.97; LMP-LRT p <.05; BLRT p <.05). Conclusions: concerning the emerging profiles, problematic and non-problematic SNSs users displayed the highest and lower levels of risk factors related to social networking, respectively. The so-called "Defended" profile might include participant adolescents who defensively avoided thinking about the psychological and emotional experiences of SNSs use, showing very low levels in all the variables exploring SNSs-related behaviors and motivations, and psychological risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.