ArticleInternational journal of telemedicine and applications2025
Acceptability of Telehealth-Delivered Occupational Therapy Among Individuals With Long COVID Using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability: A Qualitative Study.
Article in International journal of telemedicine and applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- App-based self-management program for people dealing with fatigue and trouble concentrating (DiEgO): protocol for participatory development, pilot testing, and qualitative process evaluation.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2026Article
- The 'hand-brain-emotion' axis: a theoretical model for handicraft art-based intervention in anxiety disorders through neuroplasticity and autonomic regulation.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Long COVID still challenges healthcare systems worldwide. Tailored treatments are scarce. In the ErgoLoCo study, we have developed and tested a telehealth-delivered occupational therapy intervention for people affected by long COVID. Acceptability from both recipients and providers is a prerequisite for implementing such new interventions. Aim: This study is aimed at exploring the perceptions of people with long COVID and occupational therapists regarding the intervention's acceptability and telehealth delivery approaches. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 13 participants who experience long COVID and received the ErgoLoCo intervention delivered as teletherapy sessions or prerecorded videos. Eight occupational therapists who guided the teletherapy sessions participated in a focus group. Materials were analyzed following qualitative descriptive methods and interpreted using the theoretical framework of acceptability (TFA). Results: Occupational therapists and long COVID clients considered the occupational therapy approach a positive experience. While all participants in the teletherapy group found the occupational therapy approach helpful in coping with long COVID symptoms and regaining participation in meaningful occupations, perceptions varied in the group supplied with prerecorded videos. Some saw the intervention as helpful, but all emphasized the need for professional support from occupational therapists to use the program more effectively. The occupational therapists emphasized the need to tailor the therapy content to clients' needs to ensure effective and successful management of occupational challenges. Discussion: The study highlights telehealth-delivered occupational therapy's potential benefits and challenges for individuals with long COVID. It contributes to understanding the challenges and potential of telehealth-delivered occupational therapy for long COVID rehabilitation. This study's key finding is the importance of personalized and professionally guided telehealth interventions.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.