ArticleScience advances2026
Neuronal heterogeneity of normalization strength in a circuit model.
Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuronal normalization in monkey MT is an intensity-weighted average.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Neuronal normalization in monkey MT is an intensity-weighted average.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neurons in higher-order visual areas integrate information through a canonical computation called normalization. The strength of normalization is highly heterogeneous across neurons, and this heterogeneity correlates with attention-mediated modulations in neural responses. However, the circuit mechanism underlying the heterogeneous normalization strength is unclear. In this work, we study normalization in a spiking neuron network model of visual cortex. Our model reveals that the heterogeneity of normalization strength is highly correlated with the inhibitory current each neuron receives. The correlation between inhibition and other synaptic inputs explains the experimentally observed dependence of spike count correlations on normalization strength. Further, we find that neurons with stronger normalization encode information more efficiently, and that networks with more heterogeneity in normalization encode visual stimuli with higher information and capacity. Together, our model provides a mechanistic explanation of heterogeneous normalization strengths in the visual cortex and sheds light on the computational benefits of neuronal heterogeneity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.