Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41479052›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

Morphological Data Analysis: From Descriptor Development to Predictive Modeling.

Floriane Odje, Lisa-Marie Rolli, Andrea Volkamer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Floriane OdjeData Driven Drug Design, Center for Bioinformatics, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Lisa-Marie RolliData Driven Drug Design, Center for Bioinformatics, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Andrea VolkamerData Driven Drug Design, Center for Bioinformatics, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany. volkamer@cs.uni-saarland.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This chapter explores the computational processing of morphological fingerprints for downstream analysis, including compound similarity search and activity prediction. Morphological fingerprints, derived from cell painting assay images, are numerical vectors characterizing the spatial arrangement, morphology, and texture of organelles. Using these vectors, one can train machine learning (ML) models to identify patterns and predict changes in cell morphology upon compound treatment. The chapter consists of three sections, each supported by a Jupyter notebook. The first section covers data preparation for computational analysis, such as ingesting the data, standardization, removing missing values, and normalizing data. The second section details the computation of similarity searches, identifying the closest match to a query, e.g., to identify compounds with a similar mode of action. In addition, structural fingerprints, which are derived from the molecular structure itself, are introduced to perform complementary searches on different molecular fingerprints. The third section demonstrates how to build a basic ML model to predict estrogen receptor activity and provides insights into model tuning, testing, and interpretation. Overall, this chapter provides a comprehensive guide to leveraging morphological fingerprints for advanced computational analysis in drug discovery and activity prediction studies.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDrug DiscoveryData AnalysisHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningBioactivity predictionCell painting assayMachine learningMorphological fingerprintSimilarity searchStructural fingerprint

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.