ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2026
Comparative Analysis of High-Throughput Data in AML Detection.
Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous hematological melanoma disease, which faces significant challenges in diagnosis and treatment due to its genetic complexity and variable clinical outcomes.NF342 by juxtaposition with MPO promoter/enhan In the current work, the potential of microarrays and next-generation RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is assessed for the study of cancer and specifically to separate differences in expression that distinguish samples with AML from control ones. By using datasets derived from microarrays and RNA-seq, the study observes that there are differences in gene expression between AML samples and control. The selected probes were used as a foundation in the development of a classifier that can distinguish the AML samples. The probes then underwent cross-mapping from the microarrays platform to the RNA-seq one and vice versa. This ensured the adaptability and the reliability of the classifier on different platforms. The classifier that was trained (using probes from the same platform) showed greater reliability in the dataset from next-generation RNA-seq platform, with an accuracy of 98.9%, 98.7% sensitivity, and 100% specificity. However, when opposite platform probes were used, that underwent cross-mapping, the reliability of the classifier in the dataset from microarrays platform significantly increased. In particular, it reached an accuracy of 99.3%, 99.4% specificity, and a sensitivity of 96.4%. Lastly, the selection methods were used again with a higher number of genes and then gene set enrichment analysis was performed to find the pathways where the genes are connected. This showed the significance of multiple pathways including "Protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum Homo sapiens hsa04141" and "Proteoglycans in cancer Homo sapiens hsa05205."
Indexed as
Identifiers
41479073What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.