ArticleArXiv2025
DISTRIBUTED DELAY STABILIZES BISTABLE GENETIC NETWORKS.
Article in ArXiv, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Delay is an inherent feature of genetic regulatory networks. It represents the time required for the assembly of functional regulator proteins. The protein production process is complex, as it includes transcription, translocation, translation, folding, and oligomerization. Because these steps are noisy, the resulting delay associated with protein production is distributed (random). We here consider how distributed delay impacts the dynamics of bistable genetic circuits. We show that for a variety of genetic circuits that exhibit bistability, increasing the noise level in the delay distribution dramatically stabilizes the metastable states. By this we mean that mean residence times in the metastable states dramatically increase. Relevance to Life Sciences: Bistable genetic regulatory networks are ubiquitous in living organisms. Evolutionary processes seem to have tuned such networks so that they switch between metastable states when it is important to do so, but small fluctuations do not cause unwanted switching. Understanding how evolution has tuned the stability of biological switches is an important problem. In particular, such understanding can guide the design of forward-engineered synthetic bistable genetic regulatory networks. Mathematical Content: We use two methods to explain this stabilization phenomenon. First, we introduce and simulate stochastic hybrid models that depend on a switching-rate parameter. These stochastic hybrid models allow us to unfold the distributed-delay models in the sense that, in certain cases, the distributed-delay model can be viewed as a fast-switching limit of the corresponding stochastic hybrid model. Second, we generalize the three-states model, a symbolic model of bistability, and analyze this extension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41479452PMC12755252What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.