ArticleArXiv2025
Intrinsic limits of timekeeping precision in gene regulatory cascades.
Article in ArXiv, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple cellular processes are triggered when the concentration of a regulatory protein reaches a critical threshold. Previous analyses have characterized timing statistics for single-gene systems. However, many biological timers are based on cascades of genes that activate each other sequentially. Here, we develop an analytical framework to describe the timing precision of such cascades using a burst-dilution hybrid stochastic model. We first revisit the single-gene case and recover the known result of an optimal activation threshold that minimizes first-passage-time (FPT) variability. Extending this concept to two-gene cascades, we identify three distinct optimization regimes determined by the ratio of intrinsic noise levels and the protein dilution rate, defining when coupling improves or worsens timing precision compared to a single-gene strategy. Generalizing to cascades of arbitrary gene length, we obtain a simple mathematical condition that determines when a new gene in the cascade can decrease the timing noise based on its intrinsic noise and protein dilution rate. In the specific case of a cascade of identical genes, our analytical results predict suppression of FPT noise with increasing cascade length and the existence of a mean time that decreases relative timing fluctuations. Together, these results define the intrinsic limits of timekeeping precision in gene regulatory cascades and provide a minimal analytical framework to explore timing control in biological systems.
Identifiers
41479461PMC12755261What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.