Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41479536›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Global patterns in soil seed bank seasonality: a meta-analysis of ecosystem and functional group dynamics.

Li Peng, Yafei Shi, Dong Lin, Furong Niu, Xiaoni Liu, Yuzhen Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Li PengPratacultural College, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China.
Yafei ShiPratacultural College, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China.
Dong LinPratacultural College, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China.
Furong NiuCollege of Forestry, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China.
Xiaoni LiuPratacultural College, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China.
Yuzhen WangPratacultural College, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Soil seed banks are key components driving vegetation dynamics and maintaining ecosystem resilience, and their composition and abundance play crucial roles in the establishment, maintenance, and regeneration of plant communities. Although previous studies have documented seasonal variation in soil seed banks, most have been limited to local or regional scales. Methods: To address this gap, we conducted a global meta-analysis based on 1,018 paired observations from diverse regions to systematically assess changes in soil seed bank density and species richness across early, mid, and late growing seasons. Results: Our results show that soil seed banks exhibit seasonal variation at the global scale, with patterns differing among ecosystem types and plant functional groups, and some differences reaching statistical significance. Specifically, annuals and legumes had higher seed bank densities in the late season compared to the mid-season. Grassland ecosystems showed the most pronounced seasonal fluctuations, with mid-season densities significantly lower than in the early and late growing seasons. In addition, transient seed banks supported significantly higher species richness than persistent seed banks. Conclusion: These findings reveal the seasonal dynamics of soil seed banks at the global scale and demonstrate how ecosystem types and plant functional groups influence these patterns. Overall, this study provides new insights into plant community succession and ecosystem management.

Indexed as

meta-analysispersistent seed bankseasonal variationseed banktransient seed bank

Identifiers

PMID41479536
PMCPMC12753970

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.