ArticleTechnical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology2026
Efficacy of nursing intervention using an adverse event predictive model for head and neck carbon-ion radiotherapy: A prospective clinical study.
Article in Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Radiation dermatitis and oral mucositis are common acute toxicities from carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for head and neck cancers. These toxicities often impair quality of life (QOL) and can lead to treatment interruption. This study evaluated a dose surface model (DSM) shared by patients and nurses to determine whether it helped patients become more aware of their symptoms and improve their self-care. Methods: This prospective study enrolled 46 patients with head and neck malignancies who underwent CIRT between July 2017 and December 2019. The study program included nurse interviews and administration of the DSM-based patient self-care instructions, which were conducted before treatment, every week during CIRT, and at 1 and 2 months post-treatment. The self-care checklist and daily care frequency data were assessed. QOL was evaluated using the Short Form 8 at baseline, end of CIRT, and 2 months post-CIRT. Results: Radiation dermatitis occurred in 98% of the patients (grades 2-3 in 24%) and oral mucositis in 48% (grades 2-3). The self-care checklist scores improved significantly throughout the latter half of the treatment and post-treatment periods. Self-care frequency did not significantly correlate with adverse event severity, although mouth rinsing frequency tended to increase. Two months after treatment, QOL improved across several domains, particularly mental health. Conclusion: The DSM-based nursing intervention program effectively enhanced patient awareness and confidence in managing radiation-induced skin and mucosal toxicities. This strategy may enhance supportive care and QOL during CIRT for head and neck cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.