ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2025
Latent myofascial trigger point injection improves symptoms in functional gastrointestinal disorders.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFunctional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) are common gastrointestinal conditions that significantly impair patient quality of life. Current clinical treatment methods are relatively limited, making the search for more effective therapeutic strategies critically important. Latent myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) injection, as an emerging minimally invasive treatment method, has shown potential in alleviating muscle pain and improving function, but its application in FGIDs remains insufficiently validated.
aimTo assess improvements in gastrointestinal symptom severity, quality of life indices, and treatment-related adverse events between the two therapeutic approaches.
methodsThis single-blind randomized controlled study recruited 60 FGIDs patients from Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, randomly divided into an injection group (TI group) and an oral medication group (PO group) at a 1:1 ratio. The TI group received abdominal wall latent MTrPs injection therapy, while the PO group received oral symptomatic medication treatment. Primary outcome measures were gastrointestinal symptom severity scores (Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, Irritable Bowel Syndrome Severity Scoring System scales) at 2 weeks and 4 weeks after treatment completion. Secondary outcome measures included Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index scores. Both groups underwent rigorous follow-up and assessment.
resultsThe TI group is anticipated to significantly outperform the PO group in gastrointestinal symptom relief and quality of life improvement. TI group patients are expected to show a notable decrease in symptom scores, increased quality of life index, and higher clinical effectiveness rate. Additionally, the TI group is projected to have a low adverse event rate and good safety profile.
conclusionLatent MTrPs injection therapy may represent an effective and safe new method for treating FGIDs. Compared to traditional oral medication treatment, this method demonstrates significant advantages in improving patient symptoms and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.