ReviewWorld journal of nephrology2025
Updates in the management of intradialytic hypotension: Emerging strategies and innovations.
Review in World journal of nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A Clinical Prediction Score for Intradialytic Hypotension Among Hospitalized Patients with Acute Kidney Injury.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a prevalent and critical complication of haemodialysis associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and reduced quality of life in end-stage renal disease patients. IDH results from multifactorial interactions, including excessive ultrafiltration rates (UFR), rapid osmotic shifts, impaired vascular resistance, and comorbidities such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease. It triggers hypovolemic stress, leading to myocardial stunning, cerebral ischemia, and organ dysfunction. Non-modifiable risk factors, including age and preexisting conditions, exacerbate susceptibility, while modifiable elements such as high interdialytic weight gain and improper dialysis prescriptions worsen outcomes. In this review, we aim to conduct an in-depth analysis of IDH, exploring its clinical relevance, underlying mechanisms, risk factors, and management approaches. Additionally, we advocate for a standardised definition and propose a strategic framework to guide future research efforts. Effective management requires individualised approaches, including optimised UFR, cooled dialysate, and nutritional adjustments, alongside emerging technologies like bio-impedance spectroscopy and artificial intelligence for real-time risk prediction. A multidisciplinary team approach, incorporating nephrologists, nurses, and dietitians, is essential for holistic patient care. Future research and technological advancements hold promise for mitigating IDH's clinical and systemic impact, ultimately improving patient outcomes and survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.