ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Research on rapid construction methods and evaluation of health education resources in public health emergencies based on knowledge development.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to construct and validate an interdisciplinary framework based on Library and Information Science (LIS) to improve the timeliness and accuracy of health education resource development during public health emergencies, and to provide a practical technical approach and theoretical framework through a complete "analysis-generation-evaluation" cycle for resolving the conflict between "information overload" and "precise targeting" in crisis communication. Methods: A total of 1,026 epidemic bulletins from various levels of government in China (2020-2024) were collected as the primary data source. In-depth knowledge development was achieved through core Library and Information Science (LIS) methods such as knowledge graph construction, thematic analysis, natural language processing (NLP), and association rule mining. Building upon these analytical results, an automated resource generation system was developed based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The system was subsequently evaluated using questionnaires administered to 305 users. Results: A topic modeling analysis was conducted on 1,026 epidemic announcements, revealing five themes, with preventive measures being the most prominent (32.7%). Association rule mining indicated significant co-occurrence patterns among key protective factors (support >0.6, confidence >0.8). An automated resource generation system based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was evaluated using 305 valid questionnaires, showing a high level of user acceptance. Specifically, Path analysis confirmed that perceived usefulness ( Conclusion: The core of this study established a pathway that rapidly and automatically converts authoritative epidemic announcements into personalized health education resources. The framework utilizes LIS technologies such as knowledge graphs and association rule mining to analyze the content of the announcements and achieve automatic resource generation. Empirical research shows that user acceptance of these resources depends primarily on their perceived usefulness and ease of use, with eHealth literacy playing an important moderating role in this process. The study's "analyze-generate-evaluate" closed-loop model can be extended to other crisis situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.