ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Policy dosing in school physical education and adolescent fitness: a threshold-type association in a two-wave panel study from Kunming, China.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The minimal effective "dosage" of school physical education (PE) and its nonlinear relationship to adolescent fitness are not well defined. We developed a policy-based Education Policy Dosing Index (EPDI, 0-100) from four exam-oriented domains-compulsory test intensity, elective test diversity, scoring/enforcement strictness, and competition & incentive provision-aligned with Yunnan's 2019 education-exam reform and the junior-middle-school PE examination scheme. Multiple weighting checks (equal, ±20%, PCA/entropy) were used to confirm its formative nature. Methods: We analyzed a two-wave school panel from a single public middle school in Kunming, China, yielding 2,673 student-occasion records, comprising the same 891 students measured at three time points (Grade 7 baseline, followed by two follow-ups in Grades 8-9; 2021-2023). Segmented regressions with two-way fixed effects (per 10 EPDI; reference threshold = 60) used CR2 inference. We profiled the breakpoint ( Results: EPDI showed a threshold-like association with fitness; Conclusion: An EPDI around 60 is a practical, exam-aligned planning benchmark, with diminishing marginal returns beyond the breakpoint and equity-relevant heterogeneity by sex and grade. Segmented and spline models outperformed linear models for most outcomes, and findings were robust across weighting/sensitivity checks. Estimates reflect one school over a short time period and should be replicated across schools/districts, accounting for maturation and socioeconomic markers. Associations are interpreted as non-causal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.