Factors Affecting Quality of Life in Post-Burn Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study in Indonesia.

A Y N Hidayatullah, E Zairina, I D Saputro

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A Y N HidayatullahMaster of Pharmacy Study Program, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.

E ZairinaDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.

I D SaputroDepartment of Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Dr. Soetomo General Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burn injury is trauma that has a negative impact on physical and psychosocial function and affects quality of life in post-burn patients. This study aimed to measure quality of life and analyze factors that affect quality of life, including psychological aspects in post-burn patients. This was an analytic observational study with a cross-sectional design. The study was conducted at the plastic surgery outpatient unit of Dr. Soetomo from May to August 2024 among post-burn patients who met the inclusion criteria. Quality of life was measured using the Burn Specific Health Scale Brief (BSHS-B) questionnaire, and measurement of patient depression levels uses the PHQ-9 questionnaire. Binary logistic regression was used to analyze the factors that affect quality of life. One hundred and thirteen patients were included in this study, with the majority being male. Overall, the patients' quality of life was classified as good, with an average score of 99.71 ± 30.75. Based on the PHQ-9 score, the post-burn patients were classified as mildly depressed. For female patients, the burn area, frequency of debridement, comorbid diseases and PHQ-9 score affected their quality of life (p <0.05). This study concluded that post-burn patients had a good quality of life. Interventions need to be carried out by the burn care team to improve quality of life, especially for patients with risk factors.

Indexed as

BSHS-Bburnsquality of life

Identifiers

PMID41480129

PMCPMC12755393

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.