Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41480366›Full record

Observational studyFrontiers in endocrinology2025

Optical coherence tomography and electroretinography in pituitary macroadenomas: a 12-month analysis by age and tumor type.

Monika Sarnat-Kucharczyk, Małgorzata A Janik, Paweł Janik, Beata Kos-Kudła, Dorota Pojda-Wilczek

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Monika Sarnat-KucharczykDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Małgorzata A JanikInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Silesia in Katowice, Sosnowiec, Poland.
Paweł JanikInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Silesia in Katowice, Sosnowiec, Poland.
Beata Kos-KudłaDepartment of Endocrinology and Neuroendocrine Tumours, Department of Pathophysiology and Endocrinology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Dorota Pojda-WilczekDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate longitudinal changes in optical coherence tomography (OCT) and electroretinography (ERG) parameters over 12 months in patients with pituitary macroadenomas, and to assess variation according to age and tumor type. Methods: This prospective observational study included 36 patients (72 eyes) with newly diagnosed pituitary macroadenomas. Patients were divided into a treatment group (n=23; including 9 prolactinomas (PRL), and 14 non-functioning adenomas [NFPAs]) and an observation group (n=13; all NFPAs). Both groups were further stratified by age (<60 vs. ≥60 years). Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness was measured by OCT, while functional assessment included photopic negative response (PhNR) amplitude and W-ratio from full-field ERG. Measurements were performed at baseline and 12 months. Comparative and correlation analyses evaluated longitudinal, age-, and tumor-related differences. Results: Mean age did not differ between groups (treatment: 57.4 ± 13.0 years; observation: 54.9 ± 17.2). GCIPL thickness showed no consistent group differences, except temporal thinning in observation patients ≥60 years. RNFL thinning was significant in treated patients ≥60 years (average and inferior/temporal quadrants) and in younger treated patients (<60 years) in the superior and nasal quadrants. Observation patients <60 years showed RNFL loss in average and superior values, whereas no significant RNFL changes occurred in those ≥60 years. PhNR amplitude decreased in treated patients ≥60 years, while W-ratio increased in both treated subgroups and in younger observation patients. Strong structure-function correlations were observed in treated patients ≥60 years, particularly between GCIPL average and PhNR amplitude (R=-0.51) and RNFL superior and PhNR amplitude (R=-0.63). Conclusions: Structural and functional retinal parameters (GCIPL, RNFL, PhNR) may provide supportive information for monitoring visual pathway involvement in pituitary macroadenomas. Differences between PRL and NFPAs were more evident in treated NFPA patients <60 years, suggesting tumor type and age may influence biomarker sensitivity. The absence of such differences in older patients may reflect biological homogeneity or reduced responsiveness of retinal structures. Age should be considered a potential modifier when interpreting OCT and ERG findings across clinical phenotypes of pituitary macroadenomas.

Indexed as

AdenomaElectroretinographyPituitary NeoplasmsTomography, Optical CoherenceAdultAgedAge FactorsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRetinaelectroretinographyganglion cell-inner plexiform layeroptical coherence tomographyphotopic negative responseW-ratio

Identifiers

PMID41480366
PMCPMC12753404

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.