ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
A machine learning-based predictive model for stem cell therapy outcomes in plastic surgery.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Stem cell therapy has emerged as a promising approach in plastic surgery, yet its efficacy varies markedly among individuals and lacks reliable predictive assessment tools. This study aimed to construct and validate a predictive model for assessing the therapeutic efficacy of stem cell therapy in plastic surgery by identifying key influencing factors through clinical data analysis and machine learning. Methods: Patients who underwent stem cell therapy in the Department of Plastic Surgery from June 2021 to July 2024 were retrospectively included and randomly divided into a training set and a validation set at a 7:3 ratio. Baseline clinical data were collected, and independent influencing factors were screened via univariate analysis, followed by multivariate logistic regression and LASSO feature selection in the training set. Three machine learning models-random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and K-nearest neighbors (KNN)-were constructed using Python 3.8.5 and the scikit-learn library, followed by performance validation in the validation set. Results: A total of 620 patients who underwent stem cell therapy were included. In the training set ( Conclusion: The machine learning-based predictive model for stem cell therapy efficacy in plastic surgery, constructed through clinical data analysis, exhibits moderate predictive accuracy and may serve as a reference for clinical personalized treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.