ReviewDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2026
Challenges in glycaemic control among women with type 1 diabetes and the role of MiniMed 780G system: A narrative review.
Review in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gender Differences in Diabetes Technology: Adherence and Outcomes-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Real-World Performance of the MiniMed 780G Advanced Hybrid Closed Loop Automated Insulin Delivery System in Greece.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026Article
- Challenges in glycaemic control among women with type 1 diabetes and the role of MiniMed 780G system: A narrative review.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sex-based disparities in the incidence, prevalence and disease manifestations have been observed across various medical conditions, including type 1 diabetes (T1D). Differences in glycaemic control and quality of life between men and women have been reported, with women experiencing lower rates of glycaemic targets and a higher risk for long-term complications, particularly cardiovascular disease. Additionally, women face a greater economic and mental health burden related to T1D. This narrative review explores the challenges that complicate glycaemic management in women living with T1D, including hormonal influences during puberty, pregnancy and the (peri-) menopausal period. We also summarize current available evidence on the safety and efficacy of the MiniMed™ 780G (MM780G) system in addressing these challenges for women living with T1D. Finally, recent real-world data are reported on the absence of significant sex-related differences in glycaemic outcomes of over 280 000 real-world users of the MM780G, across various age groups from childhood and adolescence to the (peri-) menopausal period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.