ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2026
'You get a different mindset' - primary care physicians' perceptions of interprofessional medication reviews for patients living independently.
Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Safe Handover or Lost in Transition?-A Retrospective Evaluation of Pharmacist Referrals to Primary Care Following Hospital Discharge.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn primary health care in southern Sweden, interprofessional medication reviews are conducted, to a limited extent, for patients living independently, with the purpose of optimising their pharmacological treatment. These medication reviews have identified and addressed many important issues regarding the patients' medication. However, there is limited knowledge regarding the participating physicians' perspectives on the work. Gaining a better understanding of the physicians' perspectives could contribute to the optimisation of the interprofessional medication review model used in primary health care. This study aimed to explore physicians' perceptions and experiences of interprofessional medication reviews in primary health care for patients who live independently.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative study based on semi-structured discussions in four focus groups with a total of 24 participating primary care physicians. The discussions were transcribed verbatim, condensed, coded and categorised using content analysis.
resultsThrough our analysis, we identified four categories:
conclusionPhysicians expressed a consistently positive view of medication reviews for independently living patients, highlighting their value for patient safety, clinical decision-making, and learning. However, practical barriers, such as time constraints and unclear routines, were seen as key obstacles to implementation. These findings reflect the dual nature of medication reviews as a value-creating intervention with logistical challenges, which need to be addressed to support broader integration in primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.