ArticlePloS one2026
Weakly supervised deep multi-instance learning for classification of endometrial lesions on hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole-slide images.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological malignancy, yet reliable screening and diagnostic approaches remain limited. We developed a weakly supervised deep multi-instance learning model (DSMIL) to classify hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole-slide images (WSIs) of endometrial tissue. A total of 885 WSIs from 442 patients, including EC, atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH), endometrial hyperplasia without atypia (EH), and normal endometrium (NE), were analyzed. DSMIL achieved an average AUROC of 0.9776 for four-class classification, with inter-class AUROCs of 0.9876 for EC, 0.9600 for AEH, 0.9771 for EH, and 0.9855 for NE, and outperformed other algorithms such as TransMSL, CLAM, and ABMIL (average accuracy = 0.8914). Attention heatmaps highlighted regions associated with pathological features, while nnU-Net v2 combined with HoverNet enabled identification of atypical glandular epithelial cells, which showed increased density, size, and perimeter but reduced axis ratios compared with normal cells. These results suggest that DSMIL provides a reliable computational pathology approach for the classification of endometrial lesions and the characterization of atypical cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.