ArticleJMIR research protocols2026
Effects of Oliceridine Versus Sufentanil on Postoperative Recovery Quality During Hysteroscopy Under Laryngeal Mask Airway Anesthesia: Protocol for a Single-Blind and Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Oliceridine versus sufentanil: a systematic review and meta-analysis of postoperative nausea and vomiting.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHysteroscopy, the gold standard for diagnosing and treating intrauterine pathologies, has shown substantial increase in its adoption in clinical practice. Nevertheless, early postoperative pain and opioid-related adverse effects remain critical determinants of recovery quality. Oliceridine-a novel G protein-biased μ-opioid receptor agonist-demonstrates an improved therapeutic range over conventional opioids in preliminary studies.
objectiveThis study aims to evaluate whether oliceridine enhances recovery quality while reducing opioid-related complications compared to sufentanil in patients undergoing hysteroscopy under general anesthesia.
methodsThis single-center randomized controlled trial will enroll 120 patients undergoing hysteroscopy under general anesthesia with 1:1 randomization to sufentanil- or oliceridine-based analgesia. The primary outcome is early recovery quality assessed by the 15-item Quality of Recovery scale at 24 hours after the surgery, while secondary outcomes include hemodynamic fluctuations during induction, total intraoperative opioid consumption and supplemental bolus frequency, proportion requiring vasoactive agents, incidence of respiratory depression in postanesthesia care unit, postoperative extubation time, opioid-related adverse events within 24 hours, and Visual Analog Scale pain scores at 30 minutes, 4 hours, 8 hours, and 24 hours postextubation.
resultsThis study received approval from the Medical Ethics Committee of Deyang People's Hospital, Deyang, China, on April 16, 2025 (approval 2025-03-009-K01). Participant recruitment is anticipated to be completed by December 2025. Data analysis, manuscript preparation, and submission for publication are expected to be completed by February 2026.
conclusionsThe successful completion of this trial will generate evidence regarding whether oliceridine enhances recovery quality while reducing opioid-related complications compared to sufentanil in patients undergoing hysteroscopy under general anesthesia.
trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2500104024; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=275501. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/84521.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.