ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Wobble-Board Dynamics Identify Individual Signatures of Balance Control for Clinical Assessment.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Wobble-board dynamics as a scalable assay of long-latency reflex function in aging.GeroScience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeUnderstanding balance control mechanisms is essential for designing effective assessment and rehabilitation strategies. Wobble-board tasks that introduce continuous postural instability offer a valuable method to investigate and enhance proactive and emergent balance control mechanisms. This study aimed to investigate proactive and emergent balance control strategies using a mediolaterally unstable wobble board, focusing on several spatial and temporal characteristics of balance control in healthy young adults.
methodsTwenty-nine healthy young adults performed wobble-board tasks under two conditions: with and without a concurrent cognitive load (Trail Making Task). The study examined two primary outcome measures: (i) spatial-peak excursion magnitude of the board and (ii) temporal-cycle duration of the board's movement. The Hurst exponent was used to characterize the stochastic properties of each series. In addition, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) were employed to assess the relationship between wobble-board dynamics and traditional balance metrics (center-of-pressure, CoP, center-of-mass, CoM, and CoP-CoM).
resultsTemporal control, indexed by cycle duration, exhibited a Hurst exponent near
conclusionWobble-board assessment isolates a dual-mode balance strategy in which spatial regulation is actively controlled while temporal structure self-organizes. The separation yields actionable targets for metric-guided, progressive training that emphasizes excursion control while monitoring temporal adaptability. Because these metrics complement conventional CoP/CoM measures, they offer a practical bridge from laboratory to clinic-friendly evaluation and feedback. Validation in aging and clinical cohorts and outcomes-focused longitudinal trials will determine their translational value for fall prevention and rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.