ArticleCurrent microbiology2026
Characterization of Secondary Metabolites from the Co-culture of Trichotomospora Caesia AC-1134 and Streptoverticillium sp. AC-1375 and Evaluation of its Antioxidant Properties.
Article in Current microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Co-Cultivation of Cross-Kingdom Microorganisms Effectively Triggers the Production of Tryptophol and Its Heterologous Expression inMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to produce secondary metabolites (SM) through the co-cultivation of Trichotomospora caesia AC-1134 and Streptoverticillium sp. AC-1375 and to evaluate their antioxidant properties. The fermentation was carried out on GYM, ISP, LB, and YGGS agar media. The radical scavenging activity of metabolites was studied using the ABTS and DPPH assays. The metabolites produced by the bacteria were identified with gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The GC-MS analysis revealed 39 and 28 compounds for the ethyl acetate and chloroform extracts, respectively. The compounds identified were grouped into the following classes: ketones, aldehydes, fatty acids, phthalate esters, ergot alkaloids, fatty amides, amides, esters, glycol ethers, ethers, etc. The DPPH radical scavenging activity of ethyl acetate and chloroform extracts ranged from 12.06 to 31.40% and 6.24 to 19.29%, respectively. The ABTS radical scavenging potential of the ethyl acetate and chloroform extracts ranged from 7.30 to 58.58% and 5.29 to 22.32%, respectively. The ethyl acetate extracts showed better free radical scavenging properties compared to the chloroform extracts. Co-cultivation of the two bacterial strains increased the diversity of the secondary metabolites produced. Microbial co-cultivation could be employed as an alternative to conventional monoculture techniques due to its ability to stimulate the production of additional metabolites that cannot be produced by single microbial strains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41483164What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.