Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41483171›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2026

Adverse drug-event detection using the tree-based scan statistics (TreeScan) and comparison with common mining methods: new user, propensity score-matched cohorts.

Hailong Li, Houyu Zhao, Hongbo Lin, Peng Shen, Lingli Zhang, Siyan Zhan

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hailong LiDepartment of Pharmacy/Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Houyu ZhaoResearch Center of Clinical Epidemiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hongbo LinYinzhou District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Ningbo, China.
Peng ShenYinzhou District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Ningbo, China.
Lingli ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy/Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. zhanglingli2023@yeah.net.
Siyan ZhanResearch Center of Clinical Epidemiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 72574158The Key Research Project of Sichuan Province 2024YFFK0082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTree-based scan statistics (TreeScan) combined with a new user propensity score (PS)-matched cohort design (PS-TreeScan) enhances post-marketing drug safety surveillance by adjusting for confounding biases. However, this method has not been compared with other signal mining techniques or used in post-marketing drug safety studies in China. We evaluate the effectiveness of the PS-TreeScan method in identifying statin-associated adverse events (AEs) by comparing it with three established signal detection methods using a Chinese real-world database.

methodsWe used data from the Yinzhou District Medical Database, encompassing patients with hypertension (2010–2016). Statin exposure and AEs were determined via outpatient/inpatient prescriptions and using ICD-10 codes in similar settings, respectively. A new user design with a 1:1 PS matching was implemented. Standard positive and negative signals were obtained from published systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and summary of product characteristics (SPC). PS-TreeScan was compared with three mining methods—incident rate ratio (crude cohort), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Gamma Poisson Shrinker (GPS)—to identify statin-related AEs. Evaluation indices were calculated using the diagnostic test evaluation method, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values were compared to assess differences.

resultsPS-TreeScan identified 15 positive signals (P < 0.05), including 8 true positives. PS-TreeScan’s sensitivity was equivalent to those of BCPNN and GPS (62%) but higher than that of the crude cohort method. TreeScan AUC values were significantly higher at 77.7% (95% confidence interval: 63.7%–91.6%).

conclusionCompared to the original data, matched data effectively reduced false positives and improved the AUC for all methods. The PS-TreeScan method outperformed the traditional methods, thus it is able to supplement other mining methods for active adverse drug reaction monitoring.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsData MiningDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingAgedBayes TheoremChinaCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsActive surveillanceDrug safetyElectronic medical recordsMethodological studyTree-based scan statistics

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.