ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2026
Development and validation of a prognostic model based on T cell signature genes in colon cancer using single-cell RNA sequencing.
Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Colon cancer (CC) stands as one of the most prevalent malignant neoplasms worldwide. Despite extensive investigations on the function of T cells in antitumor immunity and dynamics of tumor microenvironment (TME), their precise molecular contributions to the CC progression remain incompletely characterized. Differential gene expression analysis was implemented leveraging TCGA-COAD transcriptomic data, followed by the identification of T cell signature genes using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) dataset. Through intersectional analysis and subsequent prognosis-related gene screening using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models, a prognostic model was established. Moreover, its performance was evaluated via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Participants were split into high-risk and low-risk cohorts based on risk scores, to explore potential immunological differences between groups. A prognostic model was developed based on seven genes, encompassing UBE2N, TUBA1C, FXR1, CBLB, YTHDC1, GPRIN3, and AGPAT2. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the training cohort at 3, 5, and 7 years reached 0.676, 0.715, and 0.721, respectively. External validation using three GEO datasets demonstrated consistent predictive performance of the model. The AUC values at 3, 5, and 7 years were 0.632, 0.617, and 0.582 in GSE39582, 0.689, 0.755, and 0.951 in GSE17537, and 0.667, 0.653, and 0.649 in GSE161158. The identified T cell signature genes may function as potential therapeutic targets, while the developed prognostic model and nomogram may facilitate clinical decision-making for CC management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.