ArticleEndocrine pathology2026
New Insights from the Expression of the Mismatch Repair System in Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors.
Article in Endocrine pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The germline landscape of pituitary adenomas: established and emerging predisposition genes.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Review
- The role of methylation in pituitary neuroendocrine tumors current insights and emerging perspectives.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although defects in the mismatch repair (MMR) system have been occasionally reported in aggressive/metastatic pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs), the potential role of MMR dysregulation in pituitary tumorigenesis is largely unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the expression of the four key MMR components in a large series of PitNETs. MMR gene expression was studied by RT-qPCR in 127 tumors (54 PIT1, 51 SF1, 22 TPIT), and semi-quantitative immunohistochemistry (score 0-12) in selected cases (n=46). MSH2/6 and MLH1 promoters methylation was studied in 96 tumors. Except for MLH1, tumor lineage of origin was the most significant factor influencing MMR transcripts (P=0.005, <0.001 and 0.039 for MSH2/6 and PMS2, respectively), the highest levels being observed in SF1 tumors. Within subgroups, MMR transcripts were significantly lower in large/invasive PIT1 and in functioning TPIT tumors. MSH2 promoter methylation was occasionally associated with reduced MSH2 expression. Global loss of MSH6 (score 0), defining MMR deficiency, was observed in a single silent lactotroph PitNET, unrelated to the Lynch's syndrome. Near global loss involving MSH6, MSH2 or PMS2 (score 1) was observed in 5 tumors (1 lactotroph, 1 SF1, 3 TPIT). MMR mutations were excluded in 4/5 cases but 2 had LOH at MSH2/MSH6 loci. Heterogeneous immunostaining for any MMR (score 2-4) was also observed in 15 cases. In conclusion, MMR deficiency was rarely observed (2.2%) but reduced MMR expression could be found, especially in functioning corticotroph and invasive lactotroph tumors. The molecular mechanisms and prognostic significance of such findings would deserve further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.