ArticleJournal of cardiovascular translational research2026
Hemodynamic Study of Plaque Progression and Regression Based on Coronary CTA Imaging using Computational Fluid Dynamics Method: Preliminary Results.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unraveling the Hidden Balance between Quantum Confinement and Structural Modifications in Near-Infrared Fluorescent Carbon Dots.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluated coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for predicting plaque dynamics in coronary artery disease. We retrospectively analyzed 22 patients (34 lesions) with paired CCTAs (mean interval 2 years). Lesions were categorized as progression (increase in diameter stenosis ≥ 5%), stable (change within - 5% to 5%), or regression (decrease in diameter stenosis ≥ 5%). Hemodynamic indices were normalized to adjacent non-diseased segments. Logistic regression identified predictors: normalized minimum wall shear stress (odds ratio (OR) = 0.38, p < 0.001) and maximum helicity (OR = 1.44, p = 0.016) predicted progression; average vorticity (OR = 0.13, p = 0.019) and gradient oscillatory number (OR = 0.10, p = 0.001) predicted regression. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed good discrimination (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.78 for progression, 0.83 for regression). These noninvasive imaging- and hemodynamic-derived markers, which were independently associated with lesion progression, may enhance coronary artery disease risk stratification by identifying high-risk plaques beyond stenosis severity, thereby informing individualized follow-up and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.