ArticleScientific reports2026
Elevated asprosin in hypertension: evidence from an exploratory case-control study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hypertension (HTN) is a major risk factor of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Asprosin, a novel adipokine, has been linked to metabolic diseases; however, its role in HTN remains unclear. This study investigated the association between asprosin levels and HTN in 110 sex-matched participants. Sociodemographic, lifestyle, and family history data were collected, and anthropometric measurements and fasting blood samples were obtained to assess glucose, asprosin, and insulin levels. Insulin resistance and β-cell function were estimated using LogHOMA-IR and LogHOMA-β. Statistical analyses included t-tests, chi-square, Mann-Whitney U tests, receiver operating characteristic analysis with area under the curve (AUC), and ridge-penalized logistic regression. Cases reported higher stress levels and a greater maternal history of HTN compared with controls. Blood glucose, insulin, LogHOMA-IR and LogHOMA-β were all significantly elevated in cases. Median asprosin levels were higher in cases (98.7 ng/ml, IQR 57.7) than controls (65.4 ng/ml, IQR 55.4; p < 0.001) and demonstrated good discriminatory ability for HTN (AUC = 0.827; cut-off point > 79.15 ng/ml), with notable sex differences, as males showed higher discriminatory ability compared with females. Elevated asprosin was associated with higher odds of HTN (β = 1.31, SE = 0.319; OR = 3.71, 95% CI: 1.99–6.93), though the association attenuated after adjusting for antihypertensive medication and other confounders. These findings suggest that asprosin may serve as a potential biomarker for HTN, warranting further investigation into its clinical relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.