ArticleScientific reports2026
A causal deep learning approach to identifying metabolic signatures of cognitive and functional decline in alzheimer's disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cognitive and functional decline in Alzheimer's disease (AD) arises from disruptions in specific brain networks. Identifying the most affected regions is essential for understanding disease progression and developing targeted interventions. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) offers a sensitive method for detecting early metabolic dysfunction, often before structural changes become apparent. We examined regional brain glucose metabolism in relation to cognitive performance and functional independence across cognitively normal individuals, those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and AD patients. Cognitive function was measured using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and daily functioning was assessed via the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ). Imaging and clinical data were obtained from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Structural causal modeling was used to identify brain regions with a strong causal influence on MMSE and FAQ scores. These causally validated regions were then used as input to the proposed FDG-PET-based Cognition Prediction Network (FDG CogNet), a deep learning model, which includes a feature-wise attention mechanism to dynamically weight each region's contribution to prediction. Temporal, parietal, and hippocampal regions were most influential for cognitive performance, particularly in early stages of disease. Functional abilities were more strongly associated with executive and integrative regions, including the angular gyrus, temporal poles, posterior cingulate, and frontal cortices. Cerebellar regions showed compensatory activity in MCI but diminished in AD, suggesting reduced neural resilience. FDG CogNet achieved high predictive accuracy, with R² = 0.90 for MMSE and R² = 0.94 for FAQ, demonstrating that limiting inputs to causally relevant regions improved both performance and interpretability. These findings clarify stage-specific neural mechanisms in AD and show that combining causal inference with an attention-based deep learning model provides a powerful framework for accurate and interpretable prediction. This approach highlights the clinical utility of FDG PET for early diagnosis and suggests that timely, region-specific interventions offer the best opportunity to preserve cognitive and functional abilities in AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.