ArticleScientific reports2026
Gallbladder disease diagnosis from ultrasound using squeeze-and-excitation capsule network with convolutional bidirectional long short-term memory.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiple instance learning approach for automated gallbladder cancer detection using ultrasound imaging: multi-center validation of a deep learning model with the public dataset contribution.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2026Article
- A Deep Learning-Based Decision Support System for Cholelithiasis in MRI Data.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in gangrenous cholecystitis: advances in risk factor identification and preoperative prediction-a scoping review.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- GBCapsNet: A calibrated capsule network for automated gallbladder disease diagnosis via ultrasound imaging.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The gallbladder is a small, hollow organ positioned beneath the liver, primarily responsible for temporarily storing bile. Bile is a fluid formed by the liver that helps digestion. There are various types of gallbladder disease. Early diagnosis and identification are crucial for effective treatment of gallbladder disorders. Poor medical outcomes and improved patient symptoms may result from errors or delays in diagnosis. Numerous symptoms and signs, particularly those associated with gallbladder disorder, might be blurred. As a result, medical specialists must understand and interpret ultrasound images. Considering that ultrasound imaging for diagnosis is labour- and time-consuming, it might be difficult to support financially. Deep learning (DL) is an effective model that could help early identify gallbladder disease using ultrasound (US) images. In this paper, a Hybrid Deep Learning Model with Feature Engineering for the Accurate Diagnosis of Gallbladder Disease Types (HDLMFE-ADGDT) approach is proposed. The primary purpose of the HDLMFE-ADGDT approach is to develop an effective DL-based method for classifying GB disease categories. As an initial step, the HDLMFE-ADGDT technique employs a Non-Local Means (NLM) filter to remove noise and enhance the overall image quality. For feature extraction, the Squeeze-and-Excitation Capsule Network (SE-CapsNet) is employed. At last, the hybrid convolutional neural network with bidirectional long short-term memory (CNN-BiLSTM) is implemented for gallbladder disease diagnosis. A comprehensive set of experiments is conducted to validate the performance of the HDLMFE-ADGDT model on the Gallbladder diseases dataset. The empirical results demonstrate that the HDLMFE-ADGDT model outperformed existing methodologies, achieving 99.09% accuracy, 95.83% precision, 95.87% sensitivity, and 99.49% specificity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.