Evidence mapPaperPMID 41484547Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2026

Integrative analysis of GWAS, Bayesian fine-mapping, Mendelian randomization and colocalization reveals genetic determinants underlying milk-related traits in dairy cattle.

Jun Teng, Xiuxin Zhao, Qingxia Yan, Jian Yang, Fen Pei, Xinyi Zhang, Chongwei Duan, Zhujun Chen, Qianwen Xu, Yan Liu and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Jun TengShandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Livestock Germplasm Innovation and Utilization, College of Animal Science and Technology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, Shandong, China.
Xiuxin ZhaoInstitute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, 250100, China.
Qingxia YanDairy Association of China, Beijing, 100193, China.
Jian YangShandong OX Livestock Breeding Co., Ltd., Jinan, 250100, China.
Fen PeiShandong OX Livestock Breeding Co., Ltd., Jinan, 250100, China.
Xinyi ZhangShandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Livestock Germplasm Innovation and Utilization, College of Animal Science and Technology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, Shandong, China.
Chongwei DuanShandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Livestock Germplasm Innovation and Utilization, College of Animal Science and Technology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, Shandong, China.
Zhujun ChenShandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Livestock Germplasm Innovation and Utilization, College of Animal Science and Technology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, Shandong, China.
Qianwen XuShandong OX Livestock Breeding Co., Ltd., Jinan, 250100, China.
Yan LiuShandong OX Livestock Breeding Co., Ltd., Jinan, 250100, China.
Guanghui XueShandong OX Livestock Breeding Co., Ltd., Jinan, 250100, China.
Shuwen XiaInstitute of Animal Science, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, 210014, China.
Huili WangInstitute of Animal Science, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, 210014, China.
Yao GuModern Farming (Group) Co., Ltd., Ma'anshan, 243000, China.
Lingzhao FangCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.
Huiming LiuCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.
Hongding GaoNatural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), 31600, Jokioinen, Finland.
Jing AnCNRS, INRAE, Université Evry, Institute of Plant Sciences Paris-Saclay (IPS2), Université Paris-Saclay, 91405, Orsay, France.
Li JiangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Chao NingShandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Livestock Germplasm Innovation and Utilization, College of Animal Science and Technology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, Shandong, China.
Rongling LiInstitute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, 250100, China.
Yundong GaoInstitute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, 250100, China.
Xiao WangInstitute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, 250100, China. xiaowantzntc@163.com.
Jianbin LiInstitute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, 250100, China. msdljb@163.com.
Qin ZhangShandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Livestock Germplasm Innovation and Utilization, College of Animal Science and Technology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018, Shandong, China. qzhang@sdau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7551-5020

Funding

Earmarked Fund for CARS CARS-36Key R&D Program of Shandong Province 2023LZGC004National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFD1200903National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFF1000701National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023ZD0404901Shandong Cattle Research System SDAIT-09-02Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation ZR2021MC070Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation ZR2023QC252Taishan Scholar Foundation of Shandong Province tsqnz20231240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenome-wide association studies (GWAS) has identified many genetic variants associated with milk-related traits in dairy cattle. However, the causal variants or genes remain largely unknown. In this study, using a large population (> 10,000 individuals) of Chinese Holstein cattle, we performed GWAS for six milk-related traits (milk yield, fat percentage, protein percentage, fat yield, protein yield, and somatic cell score) and subsequently prioritized putative causal variants by multi-trait Bayesian fine-mapping and examined the causal genes by Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis incorporating GWAS and cis-eQTL summary data from CattleGTEx. We also conducted a colocalization analysis to identify the share putative causal variants behind the milk-related traits and gene expressions.

resultsA total of 9,688 genome-wide significant SNPs (P < 1.2 × 10−7) were identified across the GWAS results for six milk-related traits, and these SNPs were distributed in 25 unique QTL regions. Subsequently, the multi-trait Bayesian fine-mapping identified 211 independent credible sets (CS) containing putative causal variants within these QTL regions. Among these CSs, 189 CSs were significantly associated with at least one trait (average lfsr < 0.01). Notably, the lead SNPs within these significant CSs included 3 missense variants and 62 non-coding transcript variants. The MR analysis detected 268 causal associations between gene expression and milk-related traits. The colocalization analysis identified two regions containing common putative causal variants for one or multiple milk-related traits and the expressions of some genes.

conclusionsOur integrative analysis of GWAS, Bayesian fine-mapping, MR, and colocalization further confirmed the well-known causal associations of DGAT1 and GHR and the milk-related traits. In addition, we revealed some novel potential causal genes, including AHNAK, ARHGEF2, SOX13, FDPS, SCGB2A2, and MROH2B. These results enhance our understanding of genetic mechanisms underlying the milk-related traits in dairy cattle.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyMilkQuantitative Trait LociAnimalsBayes TheoremCattleChromosome MappingFemaleMendelian Randomization AnalysisPhenotypePolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID41484547
PMCPMC12784616

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.