Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41484643›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2026

Real-world comparative effectiveness of sarilumab versus Janus kinase inhibitors as monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis.

Yuji Nozaki, Kazuya Kishimoto, Tetsu Itami, Daisuke Tomita, Yumiko Wada, Takuya Kotani, Tohru Takeuchi, Toshihiko Hidaka, Shoichi Hino, Toshiaki Miyamoto and 11 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Yuji NozakiDepartment of Hematology and Rheumatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan. yuji0516@med.kindai.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0003-2810-1519
Kazuya KishimotoDepartment of Hematology and Rheumatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan.
Tetsu ItamiDepartment of Hematology and Rheumatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan.
Daisuke TomitaDepartment of Hematology and Rheumatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan.
Yumiko WadaDepartment of Internal Medicine (IV), Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan.ORCID 0009-0009-9011-213X
Takuya KotaniDepartment of Internal Medicine (IV), Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2190-0780
Tohru TakeuchiDepartment of Internal Medicine (IV), Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0065-929X
Toshihiko HidakaRheumatology Center, Miyazaki Zenjinkai Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9919-1964
Shoichi HinoDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Izumi City General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Toshiaki MiyamotoMiyamoto Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Clinic, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Hirofumi MiyakeDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Tenri Hospital, Nara, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5655-6356
Kazunari HattaDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Tenri Hospital, Nara, Japan.
Kenji MamotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7541-3745
Yutaro YamadaCenter for Senile Degenerative Disorders (CSDD), Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7895-7684
Tadashi OkanoCenter for Senile Degenerative Disorders (CSDD), Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8849-9824
Takaichi OkanoDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0873-5728
Jun SaegusaDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7606-3743
Masahiro HoritaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medical Development Field, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9360-6081
Keiichiro NishidaLocomotive Pain Center, Faculty of Medical Development Field, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1260-586X
Koji KinoshitaDepartment of Hematology and Rheumatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1809-5143
Shinya RaiDepartment of Hematology and Rheumatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3929-9751

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSarilumab (SAR), an interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor (IL-6Ri), and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) are approved options for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) when methotrexate (MTX) cannot be used. Real-world evidence for MTX-free monotherapy remains limited.

methodsWe conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of RA patients receiving SAR or JAKi as MTX-free monotherapy. To reduce confounding, 1:1 propensity score matching was performed in the overall cohort (n = 252, 126 per group) and separately within treatment-line strata: Phase 2 first-line biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs: 45 per group), Phase 3 second-line b/tsDMARDs (53 per group), and Phase 3 ≥ third-line b/tsDMARDs (47 per group). Outcomes over 12 months included drug retention, change in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), glucocorticoid (GC) tapering and discontinuation, low disease activity (LDA, CDAI ≤ 10), and safety profiles. Predictors of LDA were evaluated with logistic regression. This multicenter real-world.

resultsAcross matched strata by prior b/tsDMARDs, retention and CDAI change did not differ significantly between SAR and JAKi through 12 months. When classified by cause, adverse events (AEs)-related discontinuation was higher with JAKi, yielding lower AE-specific retention. Both groups demonstrated GC sparing overtime, with a greater increase in GC discontinuation for SAR than for JAKi in Phase 2. Baseline predictors of achieving LDA at 12 months included higher C-reactive protein (CRP) and platelet count (Plt) in both groups, with additional associations of younger age and lower hemoglobin (Hb) in the SAR. In safety analyses, overall AEs were less frequent with SAR than with JAKi, driven by lower risks of infection including herpes zoster, while other categories were similarly infrequent.

conclusionSAR and JAKi showed no statistically significant differences in 12-month retention or disease control in MTX-free monotherapy settings. Higher CRP and Plt with lower Hb, particularly in younger patients, identified better response to SAR and support biomarker guided selection between IL-6Ri and JAKi. In Phase 2, GC discontinuation with SAR suggests a practical strategy to reduce AEs while maintaining efficacy. Prospective studies should validate these findings and define actionable thresholds.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidJanus Kinase InhibitorsAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsJanus Kinase InhibitorssarilumabBiological DMARDsMethotrexateRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID41484643
PMCPMC12888330

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.