ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Classification of pulmonary diseases using machine learning and deep learning models on GLI-2012 standardized spirometry features.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence applications play an increasingly important role in medical diagnosis processes, nowadays. Spirometry, which is widely used among lung function tests, is an important method in the early diagnosis of pulmonary diseases and monitoring. In this study, the performances of different machine learning and deep learning algorithms in classifying pulmonary diseases were examined using a set of Global Lung Initiative 2012 standardized spirometry features.
methodsThe study analyzed demographic variables and different spirometry parameters to make classification for multi class classification. This was defined for both a standard four class and an extended five class problem. In this context, logistic regression, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbor, random forest, and XGBoost methods, as well as deep neural networks, convolutional neural networks models were applied in the study. Model accuracy was increased by applying preprocessing and standardization techniques to the data set. Model performances were analyzed with evaluation criteria such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, F1-macro and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve metrics.
resultsUnder the subject-disjoint test set, tree-based models achieved the highest generalization performance. The XGBoost model achieved the highest success rate with 99.24 ± 0.59% accuracy, followed by the random forest model at 97.23 ± 2.04%. The deep learning models, deep neural networks and convolutional neural networks achieved 81.61 ± 5.83% and 77.57 ± 5.55% accuracy, respectively, on the same conventional normal feature set.
conclusionsMachine learning based approaches have offered strong potential in early diagnosis of pulmonary diseases. In addition, the need for additional optimization to improve the performance of these models has been emphasized. This study provides important findings for the integration of artificial intelligence supported spirometry analysis into clinical use. However, validation of the proposed methods on larger patient groups is a critical step for the integration of these technologies into the healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.