ArticleBMC neurology2026
Tasting pain-relief through tongue stimulation: results from a feasibility study looking into the use of cranial nerve non-invasive neuromodulation in healthy individuals and chronic poststroke patients.
Article in BMC neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05370274 (Cranial Nerve Non-invasive Neuromodulation to Improve Pain and Upper Extremity Function in Individuals in the Chronic Phase of Stroke), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Cranial Nerve Non-invasive Neuromodulation to Improve Pain and Upper Extremity Function in Individuals in the Chronic Phase of Stroke: a Pilot Feasibility Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeChronic pain is a common consequence of stroke, often impairing survivors' quality of life. By targeting cranial nerves and brainstem regions involved in pain modulation, cranial nerve non-invasive neuromodulation (CN-NINM) offers a promising approach to pain relief. The aims of this study were to investigate the feasibility of using CN-NINM in people with chronic stroke and in healthy individuals, and to test the immediate effect of this modality on experimental pain. PARTICIPANTS AND
methodsThirteen adults with chronic stroke and 13 age-matched healthy adults were recruited for a single 20-min CN-NINM session, using a portable electrical tongue stimulator. The intensity of the stimulus was set by each participant at a comfortable sensation level. Feasibility was assessed in terms of recruitment, adherence, and adverse events. The effect of CN-NINM on pain was evaluated by a heat-induced thermal pain paradigm applied to the participant's forearm for 2 min before and after the CN-NINM application. Pre- and post-CN-NINM pain intensity was recorded continuously during the nociceptive stimulation using a 0-100 computerized visual analogue scale. Descriptive and non-parametric statistics were used to describe feasibility data and explore CN-NINM effects.
resultsFeasibility was supported by a recruitment rate of 1.4 person/month for stroke and 2.2 person/month for healthy participants, with 100% of adherence in both groups. No CN-NINM-related adverse effects were reported. On average, CN-NINM had no clear immediate effect on pain in both stroke and healthy participants, with no difference observed between the two groups.
conclusionThe present study offers evidence concerning the feasibility of using CN-NINM for relieving pain in stroke and healthy individuals. Although this new approach appears to be safe and acceptable for both populations, its effect on experimental pain remains questionable and unconvincing. Further studies are needed to ascertain if clinical pain can be positively impacted by CN-NINM.
trial registrationThis clinical trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05370274) on April 27, 2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.