ArticleBMC public health2026
Risk perception bias, lifestyle, and chronic disease risk in the middle-aged and older Chinese population: results of a national prospective longitudinal study.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRisk perception bias is a widespread psychological phenomenon among the public that influences health-related behaviors. However, its longitudinal association with the onset and progression of various chronic diseases, particularly among middle-aged and elderly populations in China, has yet to be systematically elucidated. This study aims to evaluate the associations between risk perception bias, lifestyle, and the risk of developing 14 chronic diseases among middle-aged and older adults in China.
methodsThis study established a nationwide prospective cohort comprising 12,326 adults aged ≥ 45 years on the basis of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). Using multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models, mediation analysis, and restricted cubic splines (RCSs), we systematically examined the associations between perceived risk bias, lifestyle factors, and the risk of 14 newly diagnosed chronic diseases. The robustness of these findings was validated through comprehensive subgroup analyses.
resultsThe baseline data from 2011 included 12,326 participants, with a mean age of 59.26 years ([SD] 9.46), 52.1% of whom were female. Optimism bias was significantly associated with an increased risk of developing up to 11 chronic diseases. Mediator analysis revealed that lifestyle played a significant mediating role in this association (mediation proportion approximately 10%–25%), but the substantial direct effect of optimism bias itself remained. RCS analysis further revealed that the risk of optimism bias tended to follow a nonlinear accelerating pattern. Subgroup analysis indicated that this association was robust in most populations, but significant effect heterogeneity was observed across different sex and regional subgroups (interaction P values < 0.05).
conclusionsThis longitudinal cohort study revealed that optimism bias is associated with an increased risk of developing multiple chronic diseases, with this association being partially mediated by lifestyle factors. Further research is needed to explore the dynamic pathways linking optimism bias, lifestyle, and multiple chronic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.